Triple

T36593024
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Barbara Fritchie E902719 entity
Predicate alternativeSpellingOfName P5330 FINISHED
Object Barbara Frietchie NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Barbara Frietchie | Statement: [Barbara Fritchie, alternativeSpellingOfName, Barbara Frietchie]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativeSpellingOfName
Context triple: [Barbara Fritchie, alternativeSpellingOfName, Barbara Frietchie]
  • A. knownAsBy
    Indicates that one entity is referred to or recognized by another entity using a particular name or designation.
  • B. nicknameSpellingNote
    Indicates that there is a note or clarification about how a nickname is spelled in relation to a given name or entity.
  • C. alsoWrittenAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative written form, spelling, or notation represented by the other entity.
  • D. hasAlternativeNameForSameCity
    Indicates that one city name is an alternative or variant name referring to the same city as another name.
  • E. hasAlternativeToponymy
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more alternative place names or toponyms used to refer to the same geographic location.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e6592e88190bac4eb00a46e9df9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c371931c8190afb1d4dd5157f92c completed May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1baf25c8190a78dd54a400d2c50 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.