Triple

T36588668
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William Butler Johnston E902601 entity
Predicate hasTasteReflectedIn P152760 FINISHED
Object Johnston–Felton–Hay House NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johnston–Felton–Hay House | Statement: [William Butler Johnston, hasTasteReflectedIn, Johnston–Felton–Hay House]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTasteReflectedIn
Context triple: [William Butler Johnston, hasTasteReflectedIn, Johnston–Felton–Hay House]
  • A. hasTasteIntensity
    Indicates the degree or strength of taste associated with something.
  • B. tasteInfluence chosen
    Indicates how one entity’s characteristics, actions, or presence affect or shape another entity’s preferences, likes, or aesthetic tastes.
  • C. hasTastingProfile
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific flavor or sensory profile, typically describing its characteristic tastes and aromas.
  • D. reflects
    Indicates that one entity (often a surface, medium, or representation) throws back, mirrors, or otherwise shows an image, property, or state of another entity.
  • E. tasteComparedTo
    Indicates a comparison of the taste or flavor of one entity relative to another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e6592e88190bac4eb00a46e9df9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.