Triple
T3658530
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slovenia–Italy border |
E77592
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputedPeriod |
P50190
|
FINISHED |
| Object | post–World War II border negotiations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: post–World War II border negotiations | Statement: [Slovenia–Italy border, hasDisputedPeriod, post–World War II border negotiations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputedPeriod Context triple: [Slovenia–Italy border, hasDisputedPeriod, post–World War II border negotiations]
-
A.
hasDisputedStatus
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
B.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
-
C.
hasDisputeHistory
Indicates that there has been at least one prior dispute or conflict involving the related entities.
-
D.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
E.
hasDisputeType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular category or type of dispute.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dfc4dc8190a441864202ab2a7a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc3d48a2081908ac0f76d548a53ee |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb847e9d881909dad2ffd0f3b6c15 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adb97cdb788190a5ce96b21bd157ab |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.