Triple

T36580043
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Western Conference Pacific Division E902365 entity
Predicate usesStandings P94650 FINISHED
Object win–loss record LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: win–loss record | Statement: [Western Conference Pacific Division, usesStandings, win–loss record]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesStandings
Context triple: [Western Conference Pacific Division, usesStandings, win–loss record]
  • A. hasStandings
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a set of rankings, positions, or status levels within a competitive or comparative context.
  • B. usesInStandingsTables chosen
    Indicates that something is employed or applied within standings tables, such as rankings or league tables, to represent or organize comparative positions.
  • C. usesRegularSeasonStandingsFor
    Indicates that one entity determines outcomes or decisions based on the regular season standings of another entity.
  • D. hasHardstandings
    Indicates that an entity possesses designated hard-surfaced areas (e.g., paved or reinforced ground) suitable for supporting vehicles, equipment, or structures.
  • E. standingsType
    Indicates the category or format of a ranking or leaderboard in which entities are ordered or evaluated.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e64d8908190868473959a250b94 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdb31800508190beec15adb9bbd292 completed May 8, 2026, 9:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdb19c381c8190bafb2f565da097f1 completed May 8, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.