Triple
T36578034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Motorola C139 |
E902309
|
entity |
| Predicate | durabilityReputation |
P185890
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Motorola C139, durabilityReputation, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: durabilityReputation Context triple: [Motorola C139, durabilityReputation, high]
-
A.
scoringReputation
Indicates that one entity evaluates and assigns a reputation-related score to another entity based on its behavior or performance.
-
B.
stoneReputation
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s reputation or renown is established, marked, or symbolized in stone (e.g., through inscriptions, monuments, or enduring records).
-
C.
collectionReputation
Indicates the perceived quality, trustworthiness, or status associated with a particular collection based on others’ evaluations or interactions.
-
D.
performanceReputation
Indicates the perceived quality or reliability of an entity’s past or expected performance as judged by others.
-
E.
managerReputation
Indicates the perceived quality, trustworthiness, and effectiveness of a manager as judged by others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e64d8908190868473959a250b94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c371931c8190afb1d4dd5157f92c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c1baf25c8190a78dd54a400d2c50 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c3705b5c81908c84004543a71c07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.