Triple
T36556210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eärnur |
E901704
|
entity |
| Predicate | responseToSecondChallenge |
P185852
|
FINISHED |
| Object | accepted and rode to Minas Morgul |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: accepted and rode to Minas Morgul | Statement: [Eärnur, responseToSecondChallenge, accepted and rode to Minas Morgul]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responseToSecondChallenge Context triple: [Eärnur, responseToSecondChallenge, accepted and rode to Minas Morgul]
-
A.
secondFactor
Indicates that one entity serves as the second factor or component in a multiplicative or combinational relationship with another entity.
-
B.
issuedChallengeFor
Indicates that one entity has formally presented or posed a challenge for another entity to undertake or respond to.
-
C.
resultOfSecondAttack
Indicates that an event or state occurs as a consequence of a second attack in a sequence of attacks.
-
D.
challengeFor
Indicates that one entity presents a difficulty, test, or obstacle that must be faced or overcome by another entity.
-
E.
secondPhase
Indicates that an entity is in, or has progressed to, the second phase or stage of a multi-phase process or sequence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e634e9481908c9ba1b87ab87c26 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c371931c8190afb1d4dd5157f92c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c1baf25c8190a78dd54a400d2c50 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c3705b5c81908c84004543a71c07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.