Triple
T36555464
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Mewlips |
E901686
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsFictionalSpecies |
P180853
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mewlips |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mewlips | Statement: [The Mewlips, containsFictionalSpecies, Mewlips]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsFictionalSpecies Context triple: [The Mewlips, containsFictionalSpecies, Mewlips]
-
A.
hasFictionalSpeciesTrait
Indicates that a fictional species possesses a particular characteristic, feature, or attribute.
-
B.
fictionalSpecies
Indicates that the subject is a species that exists only in fiction or imaginary works, rather than in real life.
-
C.
hasSpeciesInFiction
chosen
Indicates that a fictional work or universe features a particular species as part of its narrative or setting.
-
D.
hasFictionalInhabitants
Indicates that a place or setting is inhabited by fictional or imaginary beings.
-
E.
fictionalPerformerSpecies
Indicates that a performer in a fictional work belongs to, or is characterized as, a particular fictional species.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e634e9481908c9ba1b87ab87c26 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a013b78bde881909a082beced4e0157 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a013acf45508190a999b208066072bd |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.