Triple

T36518582
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Champaubert-aux-Bois E900114 entity
Predicate hasCurrentUseOfArea P196805 FINISHED
Object artificial lake LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: artificial lake | Statement: [Champaubert-aux-Bois, hasCurrentUseOfArea, artificial lake]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCurrentUseOfArea
Context triple: [Champaubert-aux-Bois, hasCurrentUseOfArea, artificial lake]
  • A. hasDayUseArea
    Indicates that a location or facility includes an area designated for daytime, non-overnight public use.
  • B. hasAreaType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific kind or classification of area (e.g., urban, rural, coastal).
  • C. hasCentralAreaUse
    Indicates that an entity’s central area is used or designated for a particular function or purpose.
  • D. hasSurfaceUse
    Indicates that something is used or intended to be used on a surface (e.g., applied to, covering, or interacting with a surface).
  • E. hasAreaOfCoverage
    Indicates that an entity provides services, influence, or applicability within a specified geographic or conceptual region.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5dada881909da2d34bc7a9202a completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe68a4b67881909ca1d9f276f922e0 completed May 8, 2026, 10:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe680234c88190b01f953987b74972 completed May 8, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe68a385f48190b942700e3eddc9b6 completed May 8, 2026, 10:50 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.