Triple

T36505154
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Siege of Harfleur E899440 entity
Predicate hasEffectOnCampaign P11098 FINISHED
Object reduced English army strength before Agincourt LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reduced English army strength before Agincourt | Statement: [Siege of Harfleur, hasEffectOnCampaign, reduced English army strength before Agincourt]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEffectOnCampaign
Context triple: [Siege of Harfleur, hasEffectOnCampaign, reduced English army strength before Agincourt]
  • A. effectOnCampaign chosen
    Indicates the influence or impact that one factor has on the outcome or performance of a campaign.
  • B. canImpact
    Indicates that one entity has the potential or ability to affect, influence, or cause a change in another entity.
  • C. hasEffectIn
    Indicates that one entity produces, causes, or exerts an effect within a specified context, system, or environment.
  • D. hasDirectEffect
    Indicates that one entity produces an immediate and unmediated impact or change on another entity.
  • E. hasMarketingCampaign
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or utilizes a specific marketing campaign.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5b92088190933afda3f7531dd4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c371931c8190afb1d4dd5157f92c completed May 3, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1b91fd88190ab85afd626603769 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.