Triple

T36492600
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ann Arbor Police Department E899089 entity
Predicate budgetCovers P102389 FINISHED
Object personnel costs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: personnel costs | Statement: [Ann Arbor Police Department, budgetCovers, personnel costs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: budgetCovers
Context triple: [Ann Arbor Police Department, budgetCovers, personnel costs]
  • A. coversCosts
    Indicates that one party assumes responsibility for paying or reimbursing the expenses incurred by another party.
  • B. hasBudgetFor chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses sufficient allocated financial resources to support, fund, or carry out another specified entity, activity, or purpose.
  • C. budgetFrom
    Indicates that a budget or funding allocation originates from or is provided by a particular source.
  • D. budgetRight
    Indicates that an entity has the authority, responsibility, or entitlement to allocate, manage, or decide on the use of a specified budget or financial resources.
  • E. budgetItemOf
    Indicates that one entity is a specific budget line or allocation that belongs to, or is part of, another entity’s overall budget.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5ad4588190bdbce60c52fbb785 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7bccf05bc8190b61fdb2b2a315811 completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.