Triple
T36486423
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moon Impact Probe |
E898943
|
entity |
| Predicate | technologyDemonstrationFor |
P35733
|
FINISHED |
| Object | future Indian lunar landers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: future Indian lunar landers | Statement: [Moon Impact Probe, technologyDemonstrationFor, future Indian lunar landers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyDemonstrationFor Context triple: [Moon Impact Probe, technologyDemonstrationFor, future Indian lunar landers]
-
A.
technologyPresent
Indicates that a particular technology exists, is available, or is currently in use in the given context or situation.
-
B.
demonstratedConcept
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
-
C.
designedToDemonstrate
Indicates that something was intentionally created or arranged for the purpose of showing, illustrating, or proving a particular concept, feature, or behavior.
-
D.
technologyDiscussed
Indicates that a conversation, text, or interaction includes discussion or mention of a particular technology.
-
E.
hasTechnologyDemonstration
chosen
Indicates that an entity includes, features, or is associated with a demonstration of a particular technology or technological capability.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e5ad4588190bdbce60c52fbb785 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7cec454a88190a9f3bbee2b856636 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c8977c288190997a892ec5f756ed |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.