Triple

T36473230
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject But Anyway E898591 entity
Predicate contributedToReputationAs P190377 FINISHED
Object jam band LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: jam band | Statement: [But Anyway, contributedToReputationAs, jam band]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contributedToReputationAs
Context triple: [But Anyway, contributedToReputationAs, jam band]
  • A. tributeAssessmentReputation
    Indicates the evaluation of an entity’s reputation specifically in the context of determining or justifying a tribute assessment.
  • B. influencedReputationAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s actions or opinions have affected how another entity is perceived in a specific role or capacity.
  • C. hasAwardReputation
    Indicates that an entity is recognized or reputed for having received a particular award or set of awards.
  • D. associatedWithReputation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
  • E. refersToPersonReputation
    Indicates that something is about, concerns, or makes reference to a particular person's reputation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e58ebd88190b75d9b169b59d793 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff1ba8694481909ceb36f26ca85612 completed May 9, 2026, 11:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff1b27f0f08190a9e74308c5b3d1ba completed May 9, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.