Triple

T36468926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PSL(2,ℂ) E898490 entity
Predicate isAdjointFormOf P185547 FINISHED
Object SL(2,ℂ) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SL(2,ℂ) | Statement: [PSL(2,ℂ), isAdjointFormOf, SL(2,ℂ)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isAdjointFormOf
Context triple: [PSL(2,ℂ), isAdjointFormOf, SL(2,ℂ)]
  • A. hasAdjointRepresentation
    Indicates that a mathematical object (typically a Lie group or Lie algebra) is associated with its adjoint representation, describing how it acts on its own Lie algebra via the adjoint action.
  • B. adjointProperty
    Indicates that one entity stands in an adjoint relationship to another, typically forming a pair of structure-preserving mappings that are mutually defined by a universal property.
  • C. isInverseOf
    Indicates that one relation reverses the direction of another, so that if the original relates A to B, its inverse relates B to A.
  • D. hasInverseFormula
    Indicates that one formula is mathematically derived as the inverse of another formula, reversing its input-output relationship.
  • E. isCanonicalFormOf
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or officially accepted form or representation of another, often more variant, entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e58ebd88190b75d9b169b59d793 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7bccf05bc8190b61fdb2b2a315811 completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7be9b9ab481908328e0e8d8ac73d4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.