Triple

T36468609
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates E898483 entity
Predicate totalNumberOfParameters P7664 FINISHED
Object 6g - 6 + 2n LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 6g - 6 + 2n | Statement: [Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates, totalNumberOfParameters, 6g - 6 + 2n]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: totalNumberOfParameters
Context triple: [Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates, totalNumberOfParameters, 6g - 6 + 2n]
  • A. parameterCount
    Indicates the number of parameters associated with a given function, method, or callable entity.
  • B. numberOfParametersOfLargestVariant
    Indicates the total count of parameters in the variant that has the greatest number of parameters among all variants of an entity.
  • C. parameterCountRelativeTo
    Indicates a relationship comparing the number of parameters of one entity (such as a function, method, or operation) to that of another entity.
  • D. hasTotalNumber chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific overall count or sum of items, elements, or units.
  • E. genericTypeParameterCount
    Indicates the number of generic type parameters associated with a given type, method, or construct.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e58ebd88190b75d9b169b59d793 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fce28d6c3081908bf76f5db63ecf68 completed May 7, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fce12d2f08819082134b5eb3db6a24 completed May 7, 2026, 6:59 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.