Triple

T36467636
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wigner semicircle law E898462 entity
Predicate hasTypicalSupportForm P200633 FINISHED
Object [-2σ, 2σ] LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: [-2σ, 2σ] | Statement: [Wigner semicircle law, hasTypicalSupportForm, [-2σ, 2σ]]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalSupportForm
Context triple: [Wigner semicircle law, hasTypicalSupportForm, [-2σ, 2σ]]
  • A. supportsForm
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility or backing for a particular form, format, or type associated with another entity.
  • B. supportsForms
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or working with specific forms or form types associated with another entity.
  • C. tieneSoporte
    Indicates that one entity provides support, backing, or a supporting structure for another entity.
  • D. typicalSupportedUnitType
    Indicates the kind or category of unit that an entity is normally designed or expected to support.
  • E. supportsFormOfState
    Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or favors a particular form or system of state governance associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e58ebd88190b75d9b169b59d793 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff9bed58dc8190a204816d4ed6c32c completed May 9, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff9b69653c81908ab0d88055a66a88 completed May 9, 2026, 8:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff9bec9d748190869caebf6bf0c78f completed May 9, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.