Triple

T36421985
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Resident Magistrates’ Courts E897181 entity
Predicate wereRenamedAs P185477 FINISHED
Object Parish Courts of Jamaica NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Parish Courts of Jamaica | Statement: [Resident Magistrates’ Courts, wereRenamedAs, Parish Courts of Jamaica]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wereRenamedAs
Context triple: [Resident Magistrates’ Courts, wereRenamedAs, Parish Courts of Jamaica]
  • A. wasRenamedIn
    Indicates that an entity changed its name to a different one at or during a specific time or event.
  • B. wasRenamedBackTo
    Indicates that an entity, after having its name changed, was later restored to its previous or original name.
  • C. oftenRenamedAs
    Indicates that an entity is frequently given a different name or title, reflecting common renaming or rebranding over time or across contexts.
  • D. renamedDueTo
    Indicates that one entity was renamed as a consequence of another specified cause, event, or condition.
  • E. willBeRenamedAs
    Indicates that an entity is planned or expected to receive a new name specified by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e559b10819099d6655a6e14587c completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7bcccd7988190aa5c931ff347d33c completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7be9b9ab481908328e0e8d8ac73d4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.