Triple

T36405782
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Court of Appeal of Malaysia E896744 entity
Predicate usesHonorificForJudges P119748 FINISHED
Object Justice LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Justice | Statement: [Court of Appeal of Malaysia, usesHonorificForJudges, Justice]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesHonorificForJudges
Context triple: [Court of Appeal of Malaysia, usesHonorificForJudges, Justice]
  • A. honorificUse chosen
    Indicates that one entity refers to or addresses another using an honorific title or respectful linguistic form.
  • B. hasHonorificSystem
    Indicates that a language or culture employs a structured system of honorifics to mark social status, respect, or formality in communication.
  • C. honorificUsage
    Indicates that one entity refers to or addresses another using an honorific title or respectful linguistic form.
  • D. hasSeniorJudge
    Indicates that one entity is assigned or linked to another entity serving in the role of a senior judge.
  • E. usesLayJudges
    Indicates that a legal system, court, or trial incorporates lay judges—non-professional, typically citizen adjudicators—into its decision-making process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e53b81081908d3b81860593f38a completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 completed May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c475c58c8190a883554231e88c88 completed May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.