Triple
T36368452
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TaxSlayer |
E895687
|
entity |
| Predicate | dataSecurityConcern |
P179367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | protection of taxpayer information |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of taxpayer information | Statement: [TaxSlayer, dataSecurityConcern, protection of taxpayer information]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dataSecurityConcern Context triple: [TaxSlayer, dataSecurityConcern, protection of taxpayer information]
-
A.
relatedSecurity
Indicates that one security has a defined relationship or association with another security, such as dependency, linkage, or relevance.
-
B.
securityReason
Indicates that something occurs, is restricted, or is justified due to concerns about safety, protection, or maintaining security.
-
C.
protectionConcerns
chosen
Indicates that there are identified risks, threats, or vulnerabilities affecting the safety, rights, or well-being of an entity that may require protective action or safeguards.
-
D.
securityAttention
Indicates that an entity is the focus of monitoring, concern, or scrutiny from a security perspective.
-
E.
securityImplication
Indicates that one entity has a consequence, effect, or relevance for the safety, protection, or vulnerability status of another entity or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e5115588190ad8738860b7bc68b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7bb3ff1b08190802b1063d55d3923 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b9a611a081908dd6aec1df3f4d7f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.