Triple

T36361045
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Knowledge Corridor E895492 entity
Predicate followsExistingLine P148835 FINISHED
Object Connecticut River Line NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Connecticut River Line | Statement: [Knowledge Corridor, followsExistingLine, Connecticut River Line]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsExistingLine
Context triple: [Knowledge Corridor, followsExistingLine, Connecticut River Line]
  • A. followedLineOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity moved along or traced the same path or trajectory previously taken or defined by another entity.
  • B. partOfFormerLine
    Indicates that something was previously a segment or component of a transportation or service line that no longer exists or operates in its original form.
  • C. adjacentLine
    Indicates that one line is directly next to another line, sharing a common boundary or position without overlapping.
  • D. successorLine
    Indicates that one line directly follows another in a sequence or ordered arrangement.
  • E. isLinedWith
    Indicates that one object or surface is covered, edged, or internally coated along its length or area with another material or layer.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5044248190b390d8887dc03254 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff3e1762d8819089a60e402e682817 completed May 9, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff3d8c6f308190a0646b1432752eb8 completed May 9, 2026, 1:58 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.