Triple
T3636096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apple III |
E77069
|
entity |
| Predicate | reliabilityIssues |
P21734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | frequent hardware failures in early units |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: frequent hardware failures in early units | Statement: [Apple III, reliabilityIssues, frequent hardware failures in early units]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reliabilityIssues Context triple: [Apple III, reliabilityIssues, frequent hardware failures in early units]
-
A.
reliabilityMechanism
Indicates a mechanism or process that ensures the dependable, consistent, and correct functioning of a system or relationship.
-
B.
facingIssue
Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing, encountering, or dealing with a problem, difficulty, or obstacle.
-
C.
knownIssue
chosen
Indicates that the subject has an issue or problem that is already identified, recognized, or documented.
-
D.
reliabilityRecord
Indicates that there exists a record or documentation capturing the reliability characteristics, performance, or history associated with an entity or relationship.
-
E.
issues
Indicates that an entity formally produces, releases, or distributes something, such as a document, order, or resource, making it officially available.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dd0be48190b738990cb20c4731 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc3278bb8819098bbeac023410111 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb842be7c8190b7dfdb7c906f294c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:24 p.m.