Triple

T36351808
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Talking to the Dead E895223 entity
Predicate protagonistAgeDescriptor P94896 FINISHED
Object young LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: young | Statement: [Talking to the Dead, protagonistAgeDescriptor, young]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protagonistAgeDescriptor
Context triple: [Talking to the Dead, protagonistAgeDescriptor, young]
  • A. protagonistAge
    Indicates the age of the main character or central figure in a narrative or scenario.
  • B. characterAgeDescriptor chosen
    Indicates how a character’s age is qualitatively described or categorized (e.g., young, middle-aged, elderly) rather than given as a specific number.
  • C. hasAgeingProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who is experiencing aging or the later stages of life as a central aspect of their role or development.
  • D. protagonistDescription
    Indicates that a text provides a descriptive summary or characterization of the story’s main protagonist.
  • E. protagonistAgeDifferenceTheme
    Indicates that the work thematically explores the significance or impact of age differences involving the protagonist.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4f437c8190a1af3ea2564f41f5 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 completed May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7bcccd7988190aa5c931ff347d33c completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.