Triple

T36349430
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Remember Sammy Jankis E895154 entity
Predicate directorOfContainingWork P196403 FINISHED
Object Christopher Nolan NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Christopher Nolan | Statement: [Remember Sammy Jankis, directorOfContainingWork, Christopher Nolan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: directorOfContainingWork
Context triple: [Remember Sammy Jankis, directorOfContainingWork, Christopher Nolan]
  • A. directorOfParentWork
    Indicates that a person is the director of a parent work (such as an original film, series, or production) from which another work is derived or adapted.
  • B. hasDirectorOfWork
    Indicates that an entity has a specific person or organization serving as the director responsible for overseeing its work or project.
  • C. directorOfWorkAboutSubject
    Indicates that a person is the director of a creative work whose content or focus is about a specified subject.
  • D. directorOfWorkFeaturingSubject
    Indicates that the subject is the director of a creative work in which another specified entity appears or is featured.
  • E. directorFullName
    Indicates that the predicate specifies the complete name of the person who serves as the director in the described relationship or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4f437c8190a1af3ea2564f41f5 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe30bc64308190b603ff1b30c2aeee completed May 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe2f7175b081908dd61e1513620bbe completed May 8, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe30bb07d08190877539d5aa202d24 completed May 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.