Triple
T3632927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ackley |
E76998
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRelationshipToProtagonist |
P38921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | annoying dorm neighbor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: annoying dorm neighbor | Statement: [Ackley, hasRelationshipToProtagonist, annoying dorm neighbor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipToProtagonist Context triple: [Ackley, hasRelationshipToProtagonist, annoying dorm neighbor]
-
A.
hasProtagonistRelationship
Indicates that there exists a central, story-driving relationship involving the protagonist and another entity within a narrative.
-
B.
relationshipToCharacter
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
-
C.
hasProtagonist
Indicates that a work of narrative has a main character who serves as its central focus or driving agent.
-
D.
relatedCharacter
Indicates that one character has a specified relationship or association with another character.
-
E.
relativeOfMainCharacter
Indicates that one entity is a family member or relative of the main character entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dd0be48190b738990cb20c4731 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc30457608190840fb5b33f9965c4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb842be7c8190b7dfdb7c906f294c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.