Triple

T3632866
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mr. Antolini E76996 entity
Predicate effectOnHolden P49700 FINISHED
Object causes Holden to flee the apartment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: causes Holden to flee the apartment | Statement: [Mr. Antolini, effectOnHolden, causes Holden to flee the apartment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectOnHolden
Context triple: [Mr. Antolini, effectOnHolden, causes Holden to flee the apartment]
  • A. heldOn
    Indicates that an event or activity takes place at a specific time, date, or occasion.
  • B. automaticallyHeld
    Indicates that the holding or possession relationship occurs by default or system rule, without requiring an explicit action or decision by the involved entities.
  • C. isHeld
    Indicates that one entity is physically supported, grasped, or kept in possession by another entity.
  • D. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • E. holdsFor
    Indicates that a particular relationship or condition remains true over a specified interval or duration of time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dd0be48190b738990cb20c4731 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc30457608190840fb5b33f9965c4 completed March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb842be7c8190b7dfdb7c906f294c completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb902e61c81908f10494f828e260f completed March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.