Triple

T3630946
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) E76951 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) E76548 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) | Statement: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), relatedCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)
Context triple: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), relatedCase, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007)]
  • A. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) chosen
    Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) is a landmark International Court of Justice judgment that addressed state responsibility for genocide during the Bosnian War, including the Srebrenica massacre, and clarified key obligations under the Genocide Convention.
  • B. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
    Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
  • C. Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
    Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
  • D. International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
    The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
  • E. Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is the country’s highest judicial authority for constitutional matters, responsible for interpreting the constitution and resolving disputes between state institutions and levels of government.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc30136e88190922bb542971b5239 completed March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b44f16ba748190a2059804305e55ab completed March 13, 2026, 5:53 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.