Triple
T3630922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) |
E76951
|
entity |
| Predicate | applicantAllegations |
P38117
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Serbia committed genocide against Croats during the 1991–1995 conflict |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Serbia committed genocide against Croats during the 1991–1995 conflict | Statement: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), applicantAllegations, Serbia committed genocide against Croats during the 1991–1995 conflict]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: applicantAllegations Context triple: [Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015), applicantAllegations, Serbia committed genocide against Croats during the 1991–1995 conflict]
-
A.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
-
B.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
C.
allegedByOpponents
chosen
Indicates that a claim or accusation is made by opponents of the subject.
-
D.
claimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
-
E.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc30136e88190922bb542971b5239 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb8410a5881909c94818d7060b2b0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.