Triple
T36309211
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Collective Security Treaty |
E894021
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mutual defense agreement |
C89
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: mutual defense agreement Context triple: [Collective Security Treaty, instanceOf, mutual defense agreement]
-
A.
collective defense agreement
chosen
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
B.
bilateral military agreement
A bilateral military agreement is a formal pact between two states that outlines mutual defense commitments, security cooperation, and related military obligations and activities.
-
C.
military base agreement
A military base agreement is a formal arrangement between a host nation and a foreign state that defines the rights, responsibilities, and conditions under which the foreign state may establish, operate, and maintain military facilities on the host nation’s territory.
-
D.
bilateral diplomatic agreement
A bilateral diplomatic agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two sovereign states that defines mutual rights, obligations, and cooperative actions in specific areas of shared interest.
-
E.
non‑aggression pact
A non-aggression pact is a formal agreement between two or more parties in which they commit not to engage in military or hostile actions against each other, typically for a specified period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4c1b248190b10667d0213537fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.