Triple
T36306685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Württemberg judiciary |
E893958
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadAppealProcess |
P97120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multi-level appeals within Württemberg courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multi-level appeals within Württemberg courts | Statement: [Württemberg judiciary, hadAppealProcess, multi-level appeals within Württemberg courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadAppealProcess Context triple: [Württemberg judiciary, hadAppealProcess, multi-level appeals within Württemberg courts]
-
A.
hasMassAppeal
Indicates that something possesses qualities or characteristics that attract or are appealing to a very large, broad, or general audience.
-
B.
hasEnduringAppeal
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
C.
handledAppeals
Indicates that one party has received, reviewed, and taken action on appeals submitted by another party.
-
D.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
E.
hearsAppealTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4c1b248190b10667d0213537fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7ba6d06f48190a71b5a2f19e2232f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b9a4aad48190a62e41c5e39339d9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.