Triple

T36304492
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zhuang script E893906 entity
Predicate belongsToWritingSystemFamily P201224 FINISHED
Object Latin writing systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin writing systems | Statement: [Zhuang script, belongsToWritingSystemFamily, Latin writing systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToWritingSystemFamily
Context triple: [Zhuang script, belongsToWritingSystemFamily, Latin writing systems]
  • A. belongsToRomanizationFamily
    Indicates that one romanization system is a member of, or classified under, a broader family or group of related romanization systems.
  • B. writingSystemFamilyRole
    Indicates the role or function that a writing system family plays within a broader linguistic, cultural, or communicative context.
  • C. haveWritingSystemsForSomeMembers
    Indicates that at least some members of a group or category possess or use one or more writing systems.
  • D. hasCommonWritingSystem
    Indicates that two entities use the same or mutually intelligible writing system for written communication.
  • E. appliesToWritingSystem
    Indicates that something is relevant or specifically pertains to a particular writing system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4c1b248190b10667d0213537fe completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffdf47d9608190830ca23d9cef6409 completed May 10, 2026, 1:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffdf00e2b4819082dd5cb78f316baf completed May 10, 2026, 1:27 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffdf46e18c8190a5e4f4e5211cb087 completed May 10, 2026, 1:28 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.