Triple
T36303399
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Her |
E893881
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterReeditedInto |
P150111
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them | Statement: [The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Her, laterReeditedInto, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterReeditedInto Context triple: [The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Her, laterReeditedInto, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them]
-
A.
editedIn
Indicates that an entity was modified, revised, or otherwise altered within a particular context, tool, environment, or time frame.
-
B.
remadeFor
Indicates that one work has been recreated or adapted specifically for another context, audience, or medium.
-
C.
editedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been modified, revised, or altered in order to become the other entity.
-
D.
laterRewrittenAs
Indicates that an earlier work, version, or expression was subsequently rewritten or replaced by a later one.
-
E.
adaptedWorkEdited
Indicates that an adapted work has been modified or revised through an editorial process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4c1b248190b10667d0213537fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00a22e32f481909b6006c5b1cdefd3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00a1bd9c908190b4aa17a61f48126f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.