Triple
T3628473
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epicureanism |
E76896
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethicalFocus |
P3363
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consequentialism |
E84417
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consequentialism | Statement: [Epicureanism, ethicalFocus, consequentialism]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: consequentialism Context triple: [Epicureanism, ethicalFocus, consequentialism]
-
A.
consequentialism
chosen
Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of actions solely by their outcomes or consequences.
-
B.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a foundational work of moral philosophy that systematically defends the view that actions are right insofar as they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
-
C.
act utilitarianism
Act utilitarianism is a moral theory that judges the rightness of each individual action solely by how much overall happiness or utility it produces compared to alternative actions.
-
D.
preference utilitarianism
Preference utilitarianism is a form of utilitarian ethics that evaluates actions by how well they satisfy the informed preferences or interests of those affected, rather than by the amount of pleasure or happiness produced.
-
E.
categorical imperative
The categorical imperative is Immanuel Kant’s central moral principle that commands universally applicable duties based on reason alone, regardless of personal desires or consequences.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dc03948190b35b7189e4175bcc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc2df2b708190afef6925a53ec551 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b433270ddc81908080698604009737 |
completed | March 13, 2026, 3:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.