Triple

T36272381
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trixie E892708 entity
Predicate hasOffbeatDetectiveStory P191045 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Trixie, hasOffbeatDetectiveStory, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOffbeatDetectiveStory
Context triple: [Trixie, hasOffbeatDetectiveStory, true]
  • A. hasFictionalDetective
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or series) features or includes a fictional detective character as part of its content.
  • B. fictionalDetective
    Indicates that the subject is a detective character who exists only in fiction rather than in real life.
  • C. companionOfDetective
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the detective’s close associate or partner, typically accompanying and assisting them in their investigative work.
  • D. hasNotableFable
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a well-known or significant fable, either as its subject, source, or key element.
  • E. hasClericalDetective
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a detective who is also a member of the clergy.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e488f34819083e254dbe288c27a completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcd867f36081908c88c55a6a1404c1 completed May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd1f47b188190b4cf4b4c748d9d03 completed May 7, 2026, 5:55 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcd866dd248190bff61c43bee93f54 completed May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.