Triple

T36269877
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SEQU E892639 entity
Predicate successorAirportIATA P45327 FINISHED
Object UIO NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UIO | Statement: [SEQU, successorAirportIATA, UIO]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorAirportIATA
Context triple: [SEQU, successorAirportIATA, UIO]
  • A. successorCodeForSameAirport chosen
    Indicates that one code is the direct replacement or follow-up code for the same airport, reflecting a change while the underlying airport remains the same.
  • B. operatorSecondaryHubAirportIATA
    Indicates the IATA airport code of a secondary hub airport used by the operator.
  • C. destinationAirportICAO
    Indicates the airport, identified by its ICAO code, that serves as the destination in a flight or travel-related context.
  • D. associatedAirport
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a specific airport, typically as its relevant or corresponding airport.
  • E. destinationAirportAlternativeName
    Indicates that an airport serves as an alternative or secondary destination for another airport, typically used when the primary destination is unavailable or unsuitable.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e488f34819083e254dbe288c27a completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0062e6bd788190a7b4f3e5befb5cbb completed May 10, 2026, 10:50 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0061989d188190b4815b2de3e8676f completed May 10, 2026, 10:44 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.