Triple
T36266475
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Victory Project simulation |
E892237
|
entity |
| Predicate | technologyStatusInStoryWorld |
P50242
|
FINISHED |
| Object | secret experimental system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: secret experimental system | Statement: [Victory Project simulation, technologyStatusInStoryWorld, secret experimental system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyStatusInStoryWorld Context triple: [Victory Project simulation, technologyStatusInStoryWorld, secret experimental system]
-
A.
technologyPresent
chosen
Indicates that a particular technology exists, is available, or is currently in use in the given context or situation.
-
B.
technologyEnabled
Indicates that one entity provides or supports the technological means that allow another entity, process, or capability to function or be carried out.
-
C.
usesTechnologyInStory
Indicates that an entity incorporates or employs a particular technology within the context of a narrative or story.
-
D.
technologyLevel
Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
-
E.
technologyCounterpartOf
Indicates a relationship where one technology serves as an equivalent, alternative, or corresponding counterpart to another technology.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4699188190af045b11a840ce31 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7bcccd7988190aa5c931ff347d33c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.