Triple
T36254690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | al-lawh al-mahfuz |
E891900
|
entity |
| Predicate | isEternalIn |
P164749
|
FINISHED |
| Object | content (divine knowledge) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: content (divine knowledge) | Statement: [al-lawh al-mahfuz, isEternalIn, content (divine knowledge)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isEternalIn Context triple: [al-lawh al-mahfuz, isEternalIn, content (divine knowledge)]
-
A.
isEternal
Indicates that something exists without beginning or end, persisting indefinitely through all time.
-
B.
eternallyExistsIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity exists perpetually within a given context, realm, or state without beginning or end.
-
C.
coEternalWith
Indicates that two entities have existed for the same infinite duration, without either one preceding the other in time.
-
D.
hasEternalFlame
Indicates that an entity possesses or maintains a flame that is intended to burn perpetually without being extinguished.
-
E.
isEPBy
Indicates that one entity is the endpoint or end position defined, determined, or reached by another entity or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4599108190811532e707d6bc2c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b5fd3f8481908b9380f82a2310f0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c44390819084fb5558b354658f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.