Triple

T36251836
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cahuapanan–Jivaroan hypothesis E891822 entity
Predicate evidenceTypeDiscussed P3168 FINISHED
Object lexical similarities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lexical similarities | Statement: [Cahuapanan–Jivaroan hypothesis, evidenceTypeDiscussed, lexical similarities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidenceTypeDiscussed
Context triple: [Cahuapanan–Jivaroan hypothesis, evidenceTypeDiscussed, lexical similarities]
  • A. usedEvidenceType chosen
    Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
  • B. evidenceTypeHandled
    Indicates that an entity is responsible for processing or managing a particular type or category of evidence.
  • C. evidenceAtIssue
    Indicates that a particular piece of evidence is directly contested, disputed, or central to the disagreement or decision in a case or situation.
  • D. titleEvidenceType
    Indicates the type or category of evidence that supports or justifies a given title.
  • E. providesEvidenceFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4599108190811532e707d6bc2c completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b5fab9908190aaecb5e3c6dd1f9f completed May 3, 2026, 8:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b4c44390819084fb5558b354658f completed May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.