Triple

T36248931
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coat of arms of Bremen E891741 entity
Predicate heraldicMetalOfCharge P100889 FINISHED
Object argent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: argent | Statement: [Coat of arms of Bremen, heraldicMetalOfCharge, argent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heraldicMetalOfCharge
Context triple: [Coat of arms of Bremen, heraldicMetalOfCharge, argent]
  • A. heraldicCharge
    Indicates that one entity serves as a heraldic charge, i.e., a symbolic figure or emblem placed on another entity’s coat of arms or shield.
  • B. heraldicAspect
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a heraldic feature, attribute, or component in the coat of arms or heraldic representation of another entity.
  • C. coatOfArmsMetal chosen
    Indicates that a coat of arms features a specific metal (such as gold or silver) as one of its heraldic tinctures.
  • D. notableHerald
    Indicates that one entity is a herald (messenger or announcer) of particular significance or prominence in relation to another entity.
  • E. coatOfArms
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic emblem or coat of arms representing another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4599108190811532e707d6bc2c completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b5f89c5c8190825ed5d4317c540c completed May 3, 2026, 8:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b4c44390819084fb5558b354658f completed May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.