Triple
T36243798
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wimbledon mixed doubles |
E891598
|
entity |
| Predicate | bestOfSets |
P185392
|
FINISHED |
| Object | three |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: three | Statement: [Wimbledon mixed doubles, bestOfSets, three]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bestOfSets Context triple: [Wimbledon mixed doubles, bestOfSets, three]
-
A.
bestOf
Indicates that one entity is the top-ranked or most outstanding member within a specified group, set, or collection.
-
B.
bestOfSeries
Indicates that one entity is the winner or top performer within a defined series or set of related items or events.
-
C.
bestOnBest
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs under conditions where each side is using its strongest or highest-performing option against the other's strongest or highest-performing option.
-
D.
bestKnownSingle
Indicates that the referenced item is the most prominent or widely recognized single associated with an entity (such as an artist or group).
-
E.
holdsBestFor
Indicates that one entity considers or maintains another entity as the most suitable or optimal choice for a particular purpose or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e44993481908fa75e4c48d0aab3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7be9d07ac8190adf796cbef60daf6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7bcccd7988190aa5c931ff347d33c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7be9b9ab481908328e0e8d8ac73d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.