Triple
T36236644
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tom Loosemore |
E891393
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | technology strategist |
C20510
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: technology strategist Context triple: [Tom Loosemore, instanceOf, technology strategist]
-
A.
technology governance expert
A technology governance expert is a specialist who designs, evaluates, and oversees policies, frameworks, and decision-making processes to ensure that technology is developed, deployed, and managed in a responsible, compliant, and strategically aligned manner.
-
B.
technology theorist
A technology theorist is a scholar who analyzes and explains how technologies emerge, function, and reshape social, cultural, economic, and political life.
-
C.
technology evangelist role
chosen
A technology evangelist role focuses on passionately promoting, explaining, and advocating for specific technologies or products to drive adoption, build communities, and influence stakeholders both inside and outside an organization.
-
D.
technology activist
A technology activist is an individual who leverages, critiques, and advocates around digital tools and systems to promote social justice, equity, and democratic control over technology.
-
E.
technology investor
A technology investor is an individual or entity that allocates capital to technology-focused companies or innovations with the expectation of financial returns driven by technological advancement and market growth.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4387048190a1b27bcbf4ec7423 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.