Triple

T36208677
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pat Patterson E1047471 entity
Predicate returnedToRing P192096 FINISHED
Object occasional matches in the late 1990s and 2000s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: occasional matches in the late 1990s and 2000s | Statement: [Pat Patterson, returnedToRing, occasional matches in the late 1990s and 2000s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: returnedToRing
Context triple: [Pat Patterson, returnedToRing, occasional matches in the late 1990s and 2000s]
  • A. returnedToUse
    Indicates that something previously inactive, unavailable, or discontinued has been put back into active use or operation.
  • B. wasReturnedTo
    Indicates that an entity was sent or brought back to a previous owner, location, or state after having been away or removed.
  • C. returnedToPort
    Indicates that an entity has come back to its home or designated port after being away.
  • D. returnedDuring
    Indicates that one entity was given back or restored to another entity within a specified time period or event.
  • E. returnedToTour
    Indicates that an entity resumed or went back to participating in a tour after having left or paused it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4214748190a76c986d2a1838c2 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcf36d2894819089b7db8e91b63c9d completed May 7, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf25c0a108190bfa823474098640b completed May 7, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcf36bb86c8190a0a0ccf47cb56e5c completed May 7, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.