Triple

T36198098
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Xining dialect E1047182 entity
Predicate standardFormOfWriting P158574 FINISHED
Object Standard Written Chinese NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Standard Written Chinese | Statement: [Xining dialect, standardFormOfWriting, Standard Written Chinese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardFormOfWriting
Context triple: [Xining dialect, standardFormOfWriting, Standard Written Chinese]
  • A. standardFormulation
    Indicates that something is expressed or represented in a conventional, officially accepted, or commonly used form or version.
  • B. writtenForm
    Indicates that one entity is the textual or orthographic representation (spelling or written version) of another entity.
  • C. standardFormUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular standard form is employed or applied within a given context, process, or system.
  • D. standardizedFormOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the normalized or officially standardized version of another, often consolidating variations or alternative forms into a single canonical form.
  • E. writingForm
    Indicates the specific script, notation, or written representation used to express a piece of language or content.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e414bdc8190996f15a544220a3d completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd4129a8848190a5002150278ac689 completed May 8, 2026, 1:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd3e0515ec8190937c7af71ebc3875 completed May 8, 2026, 1:36 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.