Triple
T36153484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edsel Corsair |
E1045655
|
entity |
| Predicate | stylingDescription |
P20701
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinctive and controversial styling |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinctive and controversial styling | Statement: [Edsel Corsair, stylingDescription, distinctive and controversial styling]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stylingDescription Context triple: [Edsel Corsair, stylingDescription, distinctive and controversial styling]
-
A.
styleDescribedAs
Indicates that the manner, aesthetic, or mode of something is characterized or labeled using a particular style description.
-
B.
stylingFeature
chosen
Indicates a visual or design-related characteristic applied to an entity, such as formatting, layout, or aesthetic treatment.
-
C.
styleFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, specifies, or is used as the style or styling configuration applied to another entity.
-
D.
stylingContribution
Indicates a contribution made specifically to the styling, appearance, or visual presentation aspects of something.
-
E.
styleInFull
Indicates that something is presented, written, or expressed in its complete, unabbreviated, or fully detailed form.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e38903c8190a52887620f90aabe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b3e2f3c08190be4fd1ae4fa1266d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1bcc47081909fe7d592ac69006c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.