Triple
T36151486
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | pairing heap |
E1045596
|
entity |
| Predicate | mergeStrategy |
P75658
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pairwise linking of subtrees |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pairwise linking of subtrees | Statement: [pairing heap, mergeStrategy, pairwise linking of subtrees]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mergeStrategy Context triple: [pairing heap, mergeStrategy, pairwise linking of subtrees]
-
A.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
-
B.
transitionStrategy
Indicates the method or plan used to move from one state, phase, or condition to another.
-
C.
mergerMethod
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which two or more entities are combined or merged into a single entity.
-
D.
intendedToMerge
Indicates that one entity had the purpose or plan to combine or consolidate with another entity into a single unit.
-
E.
behaviorAfterMerge
Indicates the resulting behavior or state of an entity or system after two or more components have been merged.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e37ace88190a906b107d388f5d1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b69b333081909cadbed3fcb8ecf5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c2a5f8819094ad4621d7b97e0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.