Triple
T3614910
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Astronomia nova |
E76575
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullLatinTitleTranslation |
P50424
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars |
E76575
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars | Statement: [Astronomia nova, fullLatinTitleTranslation, New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars Context triple: [Astronomia nova, fullLatinTitleTranslation, New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars]
-
A.
Discours sur les différentes figures des astres
Discours sur les différentes figures des astres is an 18th-century scientific treatise by Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis that examines the shapes of celestial bodies and supports the Newtonian theory of an oblate Earth.
-
B.
Mécanique céleste
Mécanique céleste is Pierre-Simon Laplace’s landmark multi-volume treatise that reformulated celestial mechanics using Newtonian gravitation and advanced mathematical analysis, profoundly shaping modern astronomy and physics.
-
C.
Astronomia nova
chosen
Astronomia nova is Johannes Kepler’s groundbreaking 1609 astronomical treatise in which he first formulated two of his three laws of planetary motion, fundamentally reshaping early modern astronomy.
-
D.
Planetary Hypotheses
Planetary Hypotheses is an ancient astronomical treatise by Ptolemy that elaborates a geometric, three-dimensional model of the cosmos to explain the motions and distances of the planets.
-
E.
De Astronomica
De Astronomica is an ancient Latin treatise traditionally attributed to Hyginus that compiles myths and explanations related to the constellations and celestial phenomena.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fullLatinTitleTranslation Context triple: [Astronomia nova, fullLatinTitleTranslation, New Astronomy, Based upon Causes, or Celestial Physics, Treated by Means of Commentaries on the Motions of the Star Mars]
-
A.
hasLatinTitle
Indicates that an entity possesses a title or name expressed in Latin.
-
B.
hasLatinTitleOf
Indicates that one entity has, uses, or is associated with the Latin-language title corresponding to another entity.
-
C.
hasTitleInTransliteration
Indicates that an entity has a specific title represented in a transliterated form from another writing system.
-
D.
originalLanguageTitle
Indicates the title of a work as it appears in its original language of creation or publication.
-
E.
inspiredLatinTitleOf
Indicates that one entity served as the creative or conceptual inspiration for the Latin title of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85da0ba481908b3b48c69efe2b98 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc27b5e008190a72a8dab7d736e64 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b433184a4081908598f4084e959c2e |
completed | March 13, 2026, 3:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb83f1e4c8190ab501c1c05b14c08 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adb9bbb62c8190989629ca11733e1b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:23 p.m.