Triple
T36141581
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wonderful |
E1045319
|
entity |
| Predicate | productionCompanyForVideo |
P25234
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Capitol Records |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Capitol Records | Statement: [Wonderful, productionCompanyForVideo, Capitol Records]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: productionCompanyForVideo Context triple: [Wonderful, productionCompanyForVideo, Capitol Records]
-
A.
productionCompanyOfOrigin
Indicates the company that originally produced or was primarily responsible for creating a given work or product.
-
B.
productionCompanyOfWork
chosen
Indicates that a company is responsible for producing a particular creative work (such as a film, TV show, or similar production).
-
C.
productionCompanyOfAppearance
Indicates that a company is the production company responsible for creating or producing a particular appearance (such as a role, episode, or performance).
-
D.
hasProductionCompany
Indicates that an entity (such as a film, show, or media work) is associated with a specific company responsible for its production.
-
E.
coProductionCompany
Indicates a company that collaborates with one or more other companies in the joint production of a work or project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e37ace88190a906b107d388f5d1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feff70fbec8190b1ff5f943f29613e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fefbcd5b7881909cfe52b32f8a4301 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:18 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.