Triple

T36119429
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tom Riddle’s wand E1044702 entity
Predicate linkedByPrioriIncantatemTo P197754 FINISHED
Object Harry Potter’s wand NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harry Potter’s wand | Statement: [Tom Riddle’s wand, linkedByPrioriIncantatemTo, Harry Potter’s wand]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedByPrioriIncantatemTo
Context triple: [Tom Riddle’s wand, linkedByPrioriIncantatemTo, Harry Potter’s wand]
  • A. associatedWithDarkWizard
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected in some way to a dark wizard, such as through allegiance, collaboration, influence, or shared activities.
  • B. enchantedBy
    Indicates that one entity has cast or holds a magical enchantment over another entity.
  • C. enchantedTo
    Indicates that one entity has been magically imbued or altered so that it possesses a special effect, property, or behavior caused by another entity.
  • D. associatedMystic
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to another through a mystical, spiritual, or esoteric association.
  • E. enchantedInto
    Indicates that one entity is magically transformed or turned into another entity through enchantment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e356c908190abc6ca1e6a05b011 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fea5e828cc8190a9b755a645dc56d2 completed May 9, 2026, 3:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fea36443f08190b2aced9b4a0525fd completed May 9, 2026, 3 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fea5e75a5481908a04d91ee7255ebb completed May 9, 2026, 3:11 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.