Triple
T36117011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GRW spontaneous collapse theory |
E1044638
|
entity |
| Predicate | ontologyIncludes |
P184699
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wave function |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wave function | Statement: [GRW spontaneous collapse theory, ontologyIncludes, wave function]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ontologyIncludes Context triple: [GRW spontaneous collapse theory, ontologyIncludes, wave function]
-
A.
hasOntologicalCategory
Indicates that an entity belongs to, or is classified under, a specific ontological category or type within a conceptual framework.
-
B.
ontologyId
Indicates that there is an association between an entity and a specific ontology identifier that formally defines or classifies it within an ontology.
-
C.
classificationIncludes
Indicates that a broader classification category encompasses or contains a specified subclass, member, or element within its scope.
-
D.
taxonOf
Indicates that one entity is the taxonomic group (taxon) to which the other entity belongs.
-
E.
ontologyStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity within an ontology lifecycle (e.g., proposed, active, deprecated, or obsolete).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e344a4c8190af3858c6d78ba88f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b3e2f3c08190be4fd1ae4fa1266d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1bcc47081909fe7d592ac69006c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7b3e0f1c88190985feab6cee8b05e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.