Triple

T36115790
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sébastien Ogier E1044610 entity
Predicate hasFormerCoDriver P197214 FINISHED
Object Julien Ingrassia NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Julien Ingrassia | Statement: [Sébastien Ogier, hasFormerCoDriver, Julien Ingrassia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerCoDriver
Context triple: [Sébastien Ogier, hasFormerCoDriver, Julien Ingrassia]
  • A. hasFormerDriver
    Indicates that an entity previously served as a driver for another entity but no longer holds that role.
  • B. alsoAssociatedWithDriver
    Indicates that an entity has an additional or secondary association with a specified driver, beyond any primary or previously stated driver relationship.
  • C. notableFormerDriver
    Indicates that a person was previously a prominent or distinguished driver for the referenced entity (such as a team, organization, or company).
  • D. runnersUpCoDriver
    Indicates that the co-driver finished in a runners-up (non-winning but top) position in a competition or event.
  • E. hasFormerParticipant
    Indicates that an entity once participated in an activity, event, or organization but is no longer a current participant.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e344a4c8190af3858c6d78ba88f completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe7bfc94bc81909eeec946e8c1c450 completed May 9, 2026, 12:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe7b74a1188190886f128e07f712da completed May 9, 2026, 12:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe7bfb71b08190bed5c33e4ab7afff completed May 9, 2026, 12:12 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.