Triple
T36081537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In a Summer Garden |
E1043660
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLyricalScoring |
P184562
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [In a Summer Garden, hasLyricalScoring, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLyricalScoring Context triple: [In a Summer Garden, hasLyricalScoring, true]
-
A.
hasLyricalStyle
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
hasLyricalForm
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical or poetic work) possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical structure or form.
-
C.
hasLyricalLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a text or expression) employs poetic, expressive, or highly figurative language.
-
D.
hasLyricalTheme
Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
-
E.
hasLyricalRegister
Indicates that something (such as a text, utterance, or expression) is associated with a particular lyrical or stylistic register in language.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e3154908190a6f702671c2bea08 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b35e32d481909ef0220e6f6ff4a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1bad2e88190963ab4ee5d4f2038 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7b2c66054819083897e25edb65ba7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:40 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.