Triple

T36079152
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Betty Broderick E1043589 entity
Predicate paroleHearing P9180 FINISHED
Object 2010 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010 | Statement: [Betty Broderick, paroleHearing, 2010]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: paroleHearing
Context triple: [Betty Broderick, paroleHearing, 2010]
  • A. paroleHearings chosen
    Indicates that one or more formal hearings are held to evaluate an incarcerated individual's eligibility or suitability for parole.
  • B. paroleEligibility
    Indicates whether and under what conditions an individual is legally eligible to be considered for release on parole.
  • C. pardonOrRelease
    Indicates that an authority formally forgives an entity for an offense or frees them from custody, penalty, or imposed restrictions.
  • D. pardonStatus
    Indicates whether an entity has been officially forgiven or exempted from penalties for a prior offense or violation.
  • E. eventuallyParoled
    Indicates that an individual who was previously incarcerated was later released from prison on parole.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e3154908190a6f702671c2bea08 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b2c771108190adeec151daad5dab completed May 3, 2026, 8:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b1bad2e88190963ab4ee5d4f2038 completed May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.